What if consciousness isn’t just something the brain does—but something reality itself is made of?
That’s the radical question at the heart of an emerging scientific movement called Quantum Information Panpsychism (QIP). And, surprisingly, it’s a question that brings this cutting-edge theory into harmony with a remarkable technology you may not have heard of yet: the Wyrdoscope, a consciousness-interactive device designed by Wyrd Technologies.
Let’s take a walk through this strange and beautiful territory, where physics meets philosophy—and the boundaries between mind and matter start to blur.
The Quantum Twist: Consciousness Is Everywhere
Physicist and inventor Federico Faggin, known for creating the world’s first microprocessor, has spent the last decade on a very different frontier: the science of consciousness.
In a recent interview, Faggin laid out his view: consciousness isn’t something that happens “in the brain.” It’s a fundamental aspect of the universe. At the deepest level, he argues, every quantum field—the invisible fabric that makes up particles and forces—is also a conscious agent.
This idea, dubbed Quantum Information Panpsychism (QIP), suggests that free will and experience are woven into the very foundation of reality. The brain doesn’t “create” consciousness—it partners with it.
It’s bold, it’s strange… and it might just explain some of the most mysterious phenomena in science.
Enter Wyrd: A Tech Mirror for the Mystery
If QIP paints the theory, Wyrd Technologies builds the canvas.
Wyrd’s devices—like the Wyrdoscope and the Wyrd Light—don’t try to measure consciousness the way you might measure temperature or weight. Instead, they act like mirrors for coherence: systems that detect subtle shifts in randomness when meaningful or emotionally charged events take place.
That may sound mystical—but it’s based on decades of research into how human intention and group dynamics can affect random data streams. The underlying model behind Wyrd’s approach is the Model of Pragmatic Information (MPI), developed by physicist Walter von Lucadou.
According to MPI, meaning—especially shared or emotional meaning—can create patterns in systems that are otherwise random, but only when the system is “closed” in a certain way (e.g., a ritual, a meditation, a moment of collective focus). But here’s the catch: try to control it or reproduce it on command, and the pattern vanishes.
Sound familiar?
Where QIP and Wyrd Meet
QIP and Wyrd might come from different worlds—one from theoretical physics, the other from experimental consciousness tech—but they converge on some astonishing points:
- Consciousness is fundamental
Both QIP and MPI argue that mind is not an afterthought of matter. It’s intrinsic. In QIP, it’s part of the quantum field itself. In MPI, it’s what gives rise to non-local “entanglement correlations” in systems involving people and meaning. - You can’t force it
QIP emphasises free will at the quantum level. MPI insists that psi effects disappear when used instrumentally. Wyrd devices show correlations only when there is deep coherence—not when you try to “make the magic happen.” - It’s all about relationship, not cause-and-effect
QIP proposes that quantum consciousness acts non-causally—not pushing particles around, but expressing intention through resonance. MPI says something similar: that what we call “psi” or synchronicity isn’t about force, but about meaningful connection. Wyrd devices don’t measure force—they measure coherence in relationship.
The Beautiful Distinctions
While QIP and Wyrd walk hand in hand in many ways, there are also rich differences worth exploring:
- Quantum vs. systemic language
QIP speaks the language of quantum fields. MPI speaks the language of systems theory, information, and closure. Wyrd brings MPI to life in tech. These perspectives complement each other—but they’re not identical. - Time and the strange loops of meaning
MPI introduces fascinating ideas like fractal time and recursive causality, where effects can appear to precede causes—so long as no usable signal passes. QIP hints at something similar but hasn’t explored time in the same way (yet). - Agency and emergence
QIP treats each field as a kind of agent. MPI tends to treat agency as emergent from the whole (the closed system). Is consciousness distributed among parts—or emergent from pattern? This is a question still in play.
Why This Matters
If QIP is right, and consciousness is fundamental, then devices like the Wyrdoscope aren’t fringe curiosities—they’re trail markers. They show that when people come together with shared intention or deep presence, something happens in the world that shouldn’t—by ordinary physics—be happening.
And if Wyrd is right, and meaning creates coherence in random systems, then QIP gives us the theoretical grounding we need to understand why.
We may be standing at the dawn of a new kind of science—one where mind and matter are no longer separated by dogma, but united by resonance.
This isn’t science fiction. It’s just science, growing up.
Further reading: